Casselberry City Commission Seat 2 · Nov 3, 2026
Travis Kelley
Candidate for City Commission Seat 2
Travis Kelley is running for Casselberry City Commission Seat 2 in the Nov 3, 2026 election, against Lourdes Crosby Garcia and Lindsay Feist.
Voter registration deadline · Mon, Oct 5, 2026
TodayCasselberry small business owner who has served as vice president and president of the Casselberry Chamber of Commerce. He is also a trustee and secretary of the Firefighters' Pension Management Fund.
- Campaign website
- countonkelley.com
Where Travis Kelley stands: positions on the record
Property taxes and spending1 sourced position
Said the city should use existing resources wisely before asking residents to pay more.
“Before asking residents to pay more, we should make sure we are using existing resources wisely, identifying efficiencies, and exploring every reasonable option to fund our priorities.”
Own statementTravis Kelley campaign site
Code enforcement1 sourced position
Said code enforcement should focus on solving problems rather than simply issuing citations.
“Code enforcement should be consistent and focused on solving problems, not simply issuing citations.”
Own statementTravis Kelley campaign site
Public safety1 sourced position
Said he supports neighborhood policing and a continued partnership between the community and law enforcement.
“I also support neighborhood policing and a continued partnership between our community and law enforcement.”
Own statementTravis Kelley campaign site
Development1 sourced position
Said development should keep pace with infrastructure and city services while respecting established neighborhoods.
“Development should keep pace with infrastructure and city services while respecting the character of our established neighborhoods.”
Own statementTravis Kelley campaign site
Also running for City Commission Seat 2
All 7 Casselberry candidates →Every claim here links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works →
See something wrong? Report an error
Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.