Camarillo City Council District 2 · Nov 3, 2026
Sylvia C. Garcia
Candidate for City Council District 2
Sylvia C. Garcia is running for Camarillo City Council District 2 in the Nov 3, 2026 election, against Susan Santangelo and Dan Gober.
Vote-by-mail ballots mailed to active registered voters · Mon, Oct 5, 2026
TodayThird-generation Camarillo resident and nonprofit director who served ten years in the Army. She is also a community advocate.
- Campaign website
- www.sylviacgarcia.com
Where Sylvia C. Garcia stands: positions on the record
Past candidacy1 sourced position
Ran for Camarillo City Council, District 2 in 2022 (lost).
Own statementVentura County Star · Nov 8, 2022
Flock license plate cameras1 sourced position
Camarillo Caller candidate questionnaire; responses published as submitted
Calls for pausing use of the Flock cameras pending an independent technology and privacy review.
“We need to pause the use of Flock cameras. Full stop.”
Own statementThe Camarillo Caller
Housing1 sourced position
Camarillo Caller candidate questionnaire; responses published as submitted
Says she would like to identify areas for more duplexes and triplexes in addition to ADUs.
“ADUs can be part of the solution, but I would also like us to identify appropriate areas for more duplexes and triplexes.”
Own statementThe Camarillo Caller
Immigration enforcement1 sourced position
Camarillo Caller candidate questionnaire; responses published as submitted
Says the federal government's lease of private property should not automatically end the City's inquiry into local land-use compliance.
“The fact that the federal government is leasing privately owned property should not automatically end the City's inquiry into whether a particular use complies with local land-use requirements.”
Own statementThe Camarillo Caller
Also running for City Council District 2
- Dan Gober
- Susan Santangelo (incumbent)
Every claim here links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works →
See something wrong? Report an error
Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.