Tualatin City Council Position 1 · Nov 3, 2026

Maria Antonieta Reyes

Candidate for City Council Position 1 (incumbent)

5 candidates · 4 seats6 sourced positions

Maria Antonieta Reyes, the incumbent, is running for Tualatin City Council Position 1 in the Nov 3, 2026 election, unopposed.

Ballots mailed to voters · Wed, Oct 14, 2026

Tualatin city councilor serving a second term, with more than 25 years in nonprofit executive leadership.

Where Maria Antonieta Reyes stands: positions on the record

Utility rates and fees2 sourced positions

Abstained on Resolution No. 5964-26, which raised water, sewer, stormwater, road and parks utility fee rates (passed 5-1 with one abstention, June 2026).
Council voteCity of Tualatin · Jun 22, 2026
Abstained on Resolution No. 5983-26 amending the city fee schedule (passed 5-1 with one abstention, July 2026).
Council voteCity of Tualatin · Jul 13, 2026

Budget1 sourced position

Voted yes on Resolution No. 5965-26 adopting the FY 2026-27 city budget (passed 6-1, June 2026).
Council voteCity of Tualatin · Jun 22, 2026

Library services1 sourced position

Voted yes on the two intergovernmental agreements with Washington County for cooperative library services (passed 6-1, June 2026).
Council voteCity of Tualatin · Jun 22, 2026

Housing1 sourced position

Says affordable and attainable housing has remained a central priority.
“Affordable and attainable housing has remained a central priority.”
Own statementWashington County Voters' Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026 (candidate statement, p. WC-41) · Sep 18, 2026

Priorities1 sourced position

Lists her focus for the next four years, including City Center revitalization and Parks Bond projects.
“I will focus on revitalizing our City Center, completing Parks Bond projects, implementing our Transportation Plan, strengthening public safety, and supporting local businesses and economic development.”
Own statementWashington County Voters' Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026 (candidate statement, p. WC-41) · Sep 18, 2026

No one else is running for this seat.

Every claim here links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works →

See something wrong? Report an error

Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.