Shoreview, MNVoter Guide 2026 · not a ballot

Shoreview City Council · Nov 3, 2026

John Doan

Candidate for City Council (incumbent)

5 candidates · 3 seats6 sourced positions

John Doan, the incumbent, is running for Shoreview City Council in the Nov 3, 2026 election; 3 candidates are running for 2 seats.

Report an error

Early voting begins · Fri, Oct 16, 2026

Shoreview councilmember and transportation engineer who is a Navy veteran. Has chaired the Shoreview Planning Commission and the State Council on Asian Pacific Minnesotans.

Campaign website
www.doan4shoreview.com

Get your Shoreview ballot cheat-sheet

Candidates, positions and dates in one email, sent now.

One email now. We only email again if you ask. No ads, never sold.

Where John Doan stands: positions on the record

Parks and trails2 sourced positions
  • Says the city should build safe, connected networks of sidewalks and trails rather than isolated segments.

    “I believe we should build safe, connected networks—not isolated segments.”

    Own statementPioneer Press · Oct 5, 2026

  • Says he voted to approve the Parks Master Plan.

    “I voted to approve our Parks Master Plan”

    Own statementPioneer Press · Oct 5, 2026

Immigration enforcement response1 sourced position
Budget and taxes1 sourced position
Development1 sourced position
  • Voted yes on the Christian Brothers Automotive plat, planned unit development and a comprehensive plan amendment changing 1090 Gramsie Road from Office to Commercial (passed 5-0, Apr 2026).

    Council voteCity of Shoreview · Apr 6, 2026

Housing1 sourced position

Also running for City Council

All 5 Shoreview candidates →

Every claim here links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works →

Take your ballot with you

Who is on your ballot, where each candidate stands, and the dates that matter, in one email you can carry to the polls. Sent right now.

One email now. We only email again if you ask. No ads, never sold.

See something wrong? Report an error

Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.