South San Francisco City Council · Nov 3, 2026
James Coleman
James Coleman (South San Francisco City Council Member) is not on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot and will stay on the South San Francisco City Council after the election.
District 4 councilmember on the South San Francisco City Council, elected in 2020.
Where James Coleman stands: positions on the record
PUC Site housing2 sourced positions
Voted yes on adopting the first major amendment to the PUC Site (1051 Mission Road) development agreement (passed 4-1, May 2026).
Council voteSouth San Francisco City Council minutes, May 13, 2026 (Regular Meeting) · May 13, 2026
Voted yes to introduce the first major amendment to the PUC Site (1051 Mission Road) development agreement (passed 3-1, April 2026).
Council voteSouth San Francisco City Council minutes, April 22, 2026 (Regular Meeting) · Apr 22, 2026
El Camino Real1 sourced position
Voted yes on advancing the pedestrian-and-bus alternative as the preferred design for El Camino Real, with SamTrans support (passed 5-0, July 2026).
Council voteSouth San Francisco City Council minutes, July 8, 2026 (Regular Meeting) · Jul 8, 2026
City fees1 sourced position
Voted yes on the fiscal year 2026-27 Master Fee Schedule changes (passed 4-1, May 2026).
Council voteSouth San Francisco City Council minutes, May 13, 2026 (Regular Meeting) · May 13, 2026
City budget1 sourced position
Voted yes on the fiscal year 2026-27 operating budget (passed 5-0, June 2026).
Council voteSouth San Francisco City Council minutes, June 10, 2026 (Regular Meeting) · Jun 10, 2026
Housing approvals1 sourced position
Voted yes to introduce an ordinance letting residential entitlements be extended by up to two years (passed 5-0, August 2026).
Council voteSouth San Francisco City Council minutes, August 26, 2026 (Regular Meeting, draft) · Aug 26, 2026
On the ballot this time
All 5 South San Francisco candidates →Every claim here links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works →
See something wrong? Report an error
Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.