Palmdale, CAVoter Guide 2026 · not a ballot

Palmdale City Council District 4 · Nov 3, 2026

Getro Elize

Candidate for City Council District 4

12 candidates · 3 seats4 sourced positions

Getro Elize is running for Palmdale City Council District 4 in the Nov 3, 2026 election, against Mark Maldonado, Eric Ohlsen and Francisco Sanchez.

Report an error

Vote-by-mail ballots begin mailing · Mon, Oct 5, 2026

Today

Getro Elize is vice chair of the Palmdale Planning Commission and an analyst with LA County Public Health. He is a U.S. Army veteran.

Occupation (from candidate statement)
Analyst
Endorsed by
Lists endorsements from SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West, Lancaster Councilmember Cedric White, and individual community members. Getro Elize for City Council
Campaign website
getroelize4citycouncil.com

Get your Palmdale ballot cheat-sheet

Candidates, positions and dates in one email, sent now.

One email now. We only email again if you ask. No ads, never sold.

Where Getro Elize stands: positions on the record

Housing1 sourced position
Development1 sourced position
Priorities1 sourced position
  • Lists jobs, small businesses, housing, public safety, infrastructure and youth workforce programs as his focus.

    “If elected, I will focus on creating quality jobs, supporting small businesses, increasing housing opportunities, improving public safety, investing in infrastructure, and expanding educational and workforce opportunities for youth and working families.”

    Own statementLos Angeles County candidate statement · Sep 29, 2026

Past races1 sourced position

Also running for City Council District 4

All 12 Palmdale candidates →

Every claim here links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works →

Take your ballot with you

Who is on your ballot, where each candidate stands, and the dates that matter, in one email you can carry to the polls. Sent right now.

One email now. We only email again if you ask. No ads, never sold.

See something wrong? Report an error

Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.