Gilroy City Council District 4 · Nov 3, 2026
Fred Tovar
Candidate for City Council District 4
Fred Tovar is running for Gilroy City Council District 4 in the Nov 3, 2026 election, against Diana Sanchez Bentz.
Vote-by-mail ballots begin mailing (week of) · Mon, Oct 5, 2026
TodayHigher education professional and former Gilroy City Councilmember who served from 2016 through 2024. Works as a college admissions consultant.
- Endorsed by
- Gilroy Firefighters Local 2805 and the Gilroy Police Officers Association, as listed on his campaign site. Fred Tovar campaign site
- Campaign website
- votefredtovar.com
Where Fred Tovar stands: positions on the record
Data centers1 sourced position
Opposes a process in which a large project moves forward before most residents learn of it.
“I am opposed to a process where a project of this magnitude can move forward and too many residents only learn about it after the most important decisions have already been made.”
Own statementFred Tovar campaign site
Transparency1 sourced position
As quoted by San Jose Spotlight
Calls for more transparency on major projects and more public input.
“We need greater transparency around major projects, better communication, meaningful public input and responsible use of taxpayer dollars”
Own statementSan Jose Spotlight · Aug 27, 2026
Homelessness1 sourced position
Says homelessness needs housing, services, jobs and prevention together.
“Homelessness isn't something that can be solved with one solution”
Own statementFred Tovar campaign site
Public safety1 sourced position
Says police and fire departments need the resources, staffing and infrastructure to keep residents safe.
“Ensuring our police and fire departments have the resources, staffing and infrastructure necessary to keep residents safe.”
Own statementFred Tovar campaign site
Also running for City Council District 4
All 8 Gilroy candidates →Every claim here links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works →
See something wrong? Report an error
Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.