Gilroy, CAVoter Guide 2026 · not a ballot

Gilroy City Council District 6 · Nov 3, 2026

Brad Starks

Candidate for City Council District 6

8 candidates · 3 seats3 sourced positions

Brad Starks is running for Gilroy City Council District 6 in the Nov 3, 2026 election, against Rebeca Armendariz and Elizabeth Bracco.

Report an error

Vote-by-mail ballots begin mailing (week of) · Mon, Oct 5, 2026

Today

Product marketing director who has lived in Gilroy for just over a decade.

Get your Gilroy ballot cheat-sheet

Candidates, positions and dates in one email, sent now.

One email now. We only email again if you ask. No ads, never sold.

Where Brad Starks stands: positions on the record

Transparency1 sourced position
  • Says local government works best when residents feel heard throughout the term.

    “I believe local government works best when residents feel heard and represented, not just during election season, but throughout the entire term.”

    Own statementGilroy Dispatch · Oct 1, 2026

Priorities1 sourced position
  • As quoted by San Jose Spotlight

    Says he wants to focus on progress residents can see in daily life.

    “I want to focus on progress that people can actually see in their everyday lives”

    Own statementSan Jose Spotlight · Aug 27, 2026

Budget1 sourced position
  • Says his finance and marketing background taught him to manage resources responsibly.

    “My professional background in both finance and marketing has taught me how to evaluate challenges carefully, manage resources responsibly”

    Own statementGilroy Dispatch · Oct 1, 2026

Also running for City Council District 6

All 8 Gilroy candidates →

Every claim here links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works →

Take your ballot with you

Who is on your ballot, where each candidate stands, and the dates that matter, in one email you can carry to the polls. Sent right now.

One email now. We only email again if you ask. No ads, never sold.

See something wrong? Report an error

Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.