Peoria City Council Acacia District · Nov 3, 2026
Emily Saeteurn
Candidate for City Council Acacia District
Emily Saeteurn is running for Peoria City Council Acacia District in the Nov 3, 2026 election, against Jennifer Crawford.
Last day to register to vote · Mon, Oct 5, 2026
TodaySocial worker with a Master of Social Work degree and an Acacia District resident for over a decade. She volunteers with community organizations and is active in the Peoria Unified School District community.
- Campaign website
- emily4peoria.org
The city's candidate list shows one candidate each for Palo Verde (Tad Snidecor) and Acacia (Jennifer Crawford), plus Emily Saeteurn as a write-in candidate for Acacia. City of Peoria
Where Emily Saeteurn stands: positions on the record
Housing and growth1 sourced position
Wants experts' guidance and residents' input on the environmental and economic impacts of city growth.
“Consider the environmental and economic impacts of new growth, seek guidance from experts, and include residents' input in decisions about city expansion.”
Own statementEmily Saeteurn for Peoria City Council
South Peoria1 sourced position
Wants growth in north Peoria balanced with investment in south Peoria's parks and programs.
“Balance growth in north Peoria with investment and revitalization in south Peoria, including parks, programs, and other community needs.”
Own statementEmily Saeteurn for Peoria City Council
Affordability1 sourced position
Says the city must meet the needs of residents struggling with rising prices, including older adults on fixed incomes.
“It is imperative that the city meets the needs of those who are struggling, ensuring they have access to resources and services in a holistic manner.”
Own statementBallotpedia · Sep 26, 2026
Schools1 sourced position
Supports Prop 428 and investment in public education.
“Emily supports Prop 428 and investment in public education.”
Own statementEmily Saeteurn for Peoria City Council
Also running for City Council Acacia District
- Jennifer Crawford (incumbent)
Every claim here links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works →
See something wrong? Report an error
Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.