Maumelle City Council Ward 3 Position 2 · Nov 3, 2026
Michael Tierney
Candidate for City Council Ward 3 Position 2 (incumbent)
Michael Tierney, the incumbent, is running for Maumelle City Council Ward 3 Position 2 in the Nov 3, 2026 election, against John Jones.
Voter registration deadline · Mon, Oct 5, 2026
TodayMichael Tierney is a bookseller and author who serves on the Maumelle City Council. He has also written a science fiction series, the Wild Stars.
- Campaign website
- www.thewildstars.com/MaumelleCityCouncil.html
Where Michael Tierney stands: positions on the record
Tree buffer ordinance2 sourced positions
Voted no on Ordinance 1171, which amends the city's vegetation chapter and abates pending prosecutions (passed 5-3, March 2026).
Council voteMaumelle City Council minutes, March 16, 2026 · Mar 16, 2026
Cautioned the council to avoid "paralysis by perfection" on Ordinance 1164 and advocated deciding on the ordinance at that meeting (February 2026).
“paralysis by perfection”
Own statementMaumelle City Council minutes, February 2, 2026 · Feb 2, 2026
Transparency1 sourced position
Wrote that his mantra is transparency and that he takes notes at every council meeting and shares them on the internet.
“His mantra is transparency.”
Own statementBallotpedia · Sep 18, 2026
What Michael Tierney said vs. how Michael Tierney voted
Tree buffer ordinance
In their words
Cautioned the council to avoid "paralysis by perfection" on Ordinance 1164 and advocated deciding on the ordinance at that meeting (February 2026).
Feb 2, 2026 ·Maumelle City Council minutes, February 2, 2026 · Feb 2, 2026
On the record
Voted no on Ordinance 1171, which amends the city's vegetation chapter and abates pending prosecutions (passed 5-3, March 2026).
Mar 16, 2026 ·Maumelle City Council minutes, March 16, 2026 · Mar 16, 2026
Also running for City Council Ward 3 Position 2
All 6 Maumelle candidates →Every claim here links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works →
See something wrong? Report an error
Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.