Austin City Council District 5 · Nov 3, 2026
David Weinberg
Candidate for City Council District 5
David Weinberg is running for Austin City Council District 5 in the Nov 3, 2026 election, against Ryan Alter, Liz Brink and Farrah Abraham.
Last day to register to vote · Mon, Oct 5, 2026
TodayHas 25 years of work in government and public service, including as chief of staff to a New York state representative.
- Occupation (from candidate statement)
- Full-time Candidate
- Campaign website
- davidforatx.com
Where David Weinberg stands: positions on the record
Bonds1 sourced position
from the city's automated transcript of the candidate panel; not an edited quote
Would have preferred the city follow staff advice on when to put the parks bond before voters.
Forum answerCity of Austin District 5 candidate panel, automated transcript (voice-to-text, unedited) · Sep 17, 2026
Taxes1 sourced position
Says trust must be restored before any future tax increases are proposed and calls for a real audit of city spending.
Own statementCommunity Impact candidate Q&A · Sep 11, 2026
Homelessness1 sourced position
Says placing homeless resource centers in one council district has failed and services should be spread across the city.
Own statementCommunity Impact candidate Q&A · Sep 11, 2026
Housing1 sourced position
from the city's automated transcript of the candidate panel; not an edited quote
Says he believes in neighborhood compatibility and listening to residents about how the city grows.
Forum answerCity of Austin District 5 candidate panel, automated transcript (voice-to-text, unedited) · Sep 17, 2026
Elections1 sourced position
as reported by Austin Current
Told the council in July he saw no reason to limit petition-initiated elections to certain dates.
Own statementAustin Current · Aug 6, 2026
Also running for City Council District 5
- Farrah Abraham
- Ryan Alter (incumbent)
- Liz Brink
Every claim here links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works →
See something wrong? Report an error
Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.