Healdsburg City Council · Nov 3, 2026

David Hagele

5 sourced positions

David Hagele (Councilmember) is not on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot and will stay on the Healdsburg City Council after the election.

David Hagele is a Healdsburg councilmember first elected in 2016 who served as mayor in 2019 and 2024.

Where David Hagele stands: positions on the record

District elections2 sourced positions

As reported by The Press Democrat
Said Draft Map A was his preference over the map the council adopted.
“Map A is clearly my preference. That’s still where I land”
Own statementThe Press Democrat · Apr 24, 2025
Voted yes on adopting Draft Map D as the final council district map (passed 3-1, April 2025).
Council voteThe Press Democrat · Apr 24, 2025

Transportation1 sourced position

Moved adoption of the Healdsburg Active Transportation Plan (passed 5-0, January 2025).
Council voteHealdsburg City Council minutes, January 21, 2025 · Jan 21, 2025

Water supply1 sourced position

Moved the resolution rejecting all bids for the test wells for aquifer storage and recovery and directing staff to seek funding (passed 4-0, May 2025).
Council voteHealdsburg City Council minutes, May 5, 2025 · May 5, 2025

Energy revenue1 sourced position

As recorded in the council minutes; not a direct quote
Was recorded as supportive of directing staff to explore battery storage, undergrounding utilities and software upgrades when council discussed renewable energy credit revenue (February 2025).
Own statementHealdsburg City Council minutes, February 3, 2025 · Feb 3, 2025

In their words

Said Draft Map A was his preference over the map the council adopted.
Apr 24, 2025 ·As reported by The Press Democrat ·The Press Democrat · Apr 24, 2025

On the record

Voted yes on adopting Draft Map D as the final council district map (passed 3-1, April 2025).
Apr 24, 2025 ·The Press Democrat · Apr 24, 2025

Every claim here links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works →

See something wrong? Report an error

Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.