Ceres City Council District 2 · Nov 3, 2026
Rosalinda L. Vierra
Candidate for City Council District 2 (incumbent)
Rosalinda L. Vierra, the incumbent, is running for Ceres City Council District 2 in the Nov 3, 2026 election, against Jorge Guerrero Jr. and Galen Guzman.
Ballots begin mailing · Mon, Oct 5, 2026
TodayCeres councilmember elected in 2022 and a student success specialist at a local college.
- Occupation (from candidate statement)
- Student success specialist
- Campaign website
- www.rosalindavierra.com
Where Rosalinda L. Vierra stands: positions on the record
Housing plan code changes1 sourced position
Voted yes on the ordinance amending the Municipal Code to implement the 2023-2031 Housing Element (passed 3-2, July 2026).
Council voteCeres City Council minutes, 2026-07-27 · Jul 27, 2026
Special taxes and assessments2 sourced positions
Voted yes on ordering the 2026/27 levy of special taxes for Community Facilities Districts No. 1 and No. 2 (each passed 3-2, July 2026).
Council voteCeres City Council minutes, 2026-07-27 · Jul 27, 2026
Voted yes on ordering the 2026-27 levy of assessments for the 1987 Landscaping and Lighting District (passed 3-1, one member absent, August 2026).
Council voteCeres City Council minutes, 2026-08-10 · Aug 10, 2026
Police staffing1 sourced position
Voted yes on unfreezing one police sergeant position and freezing one police officer position (passed 4-1, July 2026).
Council voteCeres City Council minutes, 2026-07-27 · Jul 27, 2026
Public safety and infrastructure1 sourced position
as reported by the Modesto Bee; not a direct quote
Lists strengthening public safety, improving parks and addressing infrastructure projects among her priorities, as reported by the Modesto Bee.
Own statementModesto Bee, Ceres candidates outline priorities for city council · Sep 16, 2026
Also running for City Council District 2
All 5 Ceres candidates →Every claim here links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works →
See something wrong? Report an error
Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.