Banning City Council District 4 · Nov 3, 2026
Marco Santana
Candidate for City Council District 4
Marco Santana is running for Banning City Council District 4 in the Nov 3, 2026 election, against Richard Royce and Nathaniel Rodriguez.
Vote-by-mail ballots mailed (deadline for counties) · Mon, Oct 5, 2026
TodayWorkforce development specialist who helps residents access career training and apprenticeships.
- Occupation (from candidate statement)
- Workforce Development Specialist
- Endorsed by
- His campaign website lists endorsers including Riverside City Council members Clarissa Cervantes and Luis Hernandez and Banning Planning Commission Chair Chris Castorena. Santana for Banning
- Campaign website
- www.santanaforbanning.com
Chris Castorena is listed as an endorser on Marco Santana's campaign website. Santana for Banning
Where Marco Santana stands: positions on the record
Development1 sourced position
Says in his ballot statement that Banning has spent too long chasing warehouses and development that benefits a few while residents bear the consequences.
Own statementRiverside County candidate statements, November 3, 2026 (City of Banning) · Sep 1, 2026
City budget1 sourced position
Campaign website says residents deserve public services they can count on, not cuts.
“Residents deserve public services they can count on, not cuts that leave families paying more and getting less.”
Own statementSantana for Banning
Parks and recreation1 sourced position
Campaign website says he will fight to protect essential services, including keeping parks and recreation services free.
“I will fight to protect essential services, including reliable utilities, public health resources, keeping parks and recreation services free, and accessible childcare”
Own statementSantana for Banning
Also running for City Council District 4
- Nathaniel Rodriguez
- Richard Royce (incumbent)
Every claim here links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works →
See something wrong? Report an error
Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.