Fate City Council Place 1 · Nov 3, 2026
Joshua
Martin
Joshua Martin is running for Fate City Council Place 1 in the Nov 3, 2026 election, against Stephanie Adams and Randy Long.
Not sure who to vote for? Answer a few questions and see which Fate candidates agree with you, and why.
No sign-in. Your answers stay on your device. We never endorse anyone. Report an error
The race · City Council Place 1
- 01Stephanie Adams
- 02Randy Long
- 03Joshua MartinYou’re reading
Background
- About
- Marketing professional who has lived in Fate's Woodcreek neighborhood since 2020.
- Campaign website
- joshforfate.com
On the record: Joshua Martin
4 sourced01Council conduct1 sourced position
Says council members should be able to disagree and still get the work done.
We should be able to disagree and still get the work done.”
Own statementJoshua Martin campaign websiteLink
02Growth and development1 sourced position
Says he wants to understand traffic, water and sewer capacity and service costs when reviewing development.
When reviewing development, I want to understand the traffic it will add, the capacity of our water and sewer systems, and the cost of providing police, fire and other services.”
Own statementJoshua Martin campaign websiteLink
03Public safety1 sourced position
Says staffing decisions should account for call volume, response times and available personnel on each shift.
I want staffing decisions to account for call volume, response times, overlapping emergencies and the personnel actually available on each shift.”
Own statementJoshua Martin campaign websiteLink
04Taxes and spending1 sourced position
Says he is for low taxes but wants spending questioned alongside funding of basic services.
I’m for low taxes, but not a race to the bottom.”
Own statementJoshua Martin campaign websiteLink
Every claim links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works
Match quiz · 2 minutes · no sign-in
See which Fate candidates match you
Also on your Fate ballot
See something wrong? Report an error
Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.