San Francisco · Tax measure · Nov 3, 2026

Proposition I: Changes to Real Property Transfer Tax

Proposition I is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot in San Francisco. This page summarizes the official documents; every statement links to its source, and we take no position on how you should vote.

Report an error

The question on your ballot

“Shall the City permanently dedicate half of the transfer tax revenues collected when certain real estate with a value or sales price of more than $10,000,000 changes hands, which will continue to be taxed at rates of 5.5% to 6%, to be spent only on affordable housing, including social housing developments and housing assistance, and exempt certain sales from the dedicated portion of the tax, for an estimated annual revenue decrease of approximately $1 million?”

City Attorney · Aug 7, 2026

A YES vote means

The current transfer tax would be reduced by half for certain properties, and a new transfer tax of approximately the same amount would be established, spendable only on affordable housing and other specified purposes.

Title and Summary of Proposition I

A NO vote means

A NO vote would not make these changes: the current transfer tax would not be reduced by half for these properties, and the new transfer tax would not be established.

Title and Summary of Proposition I

The money

The official arguments

These are the arguments filed with the county for the official voter guide. They are written by their authors, not by the city or by us. We summarize what each says, not whether it is accurate.

Argument in favor

The argument says voters approved a transfer tax in 2020 for affordable housing and rent relief, and that none of it went to affordable housing in two years. It says Proposition I raises no taxes and requires annual audits.

Signed by Affordable Housing Alliance; San Francisco Tenants Union; Small Business Forward; United Educators of San Francisco; SEIU 1021; and others as printed

Official Proponent Argument, Proposition I (Dept. of Elections submission)

Argument against

The argument says a restricted fund takes money from the General Fund that pays for services. It says transfer tax revenue is volatile, the measure burdens commercial real estate, and it reduces budget flexibility.

Signed by Judge Quentin L Kopp; San Francisco Taxpayers Association

Official Opponent Argument, Proposition I (Dept. of Elections submission)

Read the official documents

Neighbor opinions

Where do you stand on Changes to Real Property Transfer Tax?

Opinions from people who signed in. Not a poll, not a vote, and not our endorsement. We don't check where anyone lives. Your name is never shown.

Keep going on your San Francisco ballot

Did this help?

PlayPotus is a small independent site: no ads, no campaign or party money. A few dollars from readers keeps local voter guides free.

Chip in $5

This supports the site, not any candidate or party. Not tax-deductible.

Every claim here links to its source. See something wrong? Report an errorand we'll check it against the source.

Back to the San Francisco guide

Take your ballot with you

Who is on your ballot, where each candidate stands, and the dates that matter, in one email you can carry to the polls. Sent right now.

One email now. We only email again if you ask. No ads, never sold.

See something wrong? Report an error

Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.