Windsor Town Council · Nov 3, 2026
Braden L.
Overman
Braden L. Overman is running for Windsor Town Council in the Nov 3, 2026 election; 4 candidates are running for 3 seats.
Not sure who to vote for? Answer a few questions and see which Windsor candidates agree with you, and why.
No sign-in. Your answers stay on your device. We never endorse anyone. Report an error
The race · Town Council
- 01Amanda M. Baig
- 02David E. Carraway
- 03Edward G. "Gibbie" Dowdy IIIncumbent
- 04Braden L. OvermanYou’re reading
Background
- About
- Retired U.S. Navy chief fire controlman who now works in Navy systems test and evaluation.
On the record: Braden L. Overman
4 sourced01Housing growth1 sourced position
Said Windsor can benefit from more growth and development, especially businesses and services for current residents.
Yes, I think Windsor can benefit from more growth and development, particularly businesses and services that benefit the people who already live here.”
Own statementWindsor Weekly · Oct 8, 2026Link
02Town budget1 sourced position
Said the town should understand the long-term cost of major projects before committing to them.
I also think we need to be smart about how taxpayer money is spent.”
Own statementWindsor Weekly · Oct 8, 2026Link
03Infrastructure1 sourced position
Wants the town to plan ahead for infrastructure problems rather than wait for emergencies.
I’d rather identify problems and start planning for them now than wait until something becomes an emergency and costs taxpayers more money.”
Own statementWindsor Weekly · Oct 8, 2026Link
04Communication with residents1 sourced position
Wants more communication between the town and residents.
I’d like to see more communication between the town and the people who live here.”
Own statementWindsor Weekly · Oct 8, 2026Link
Every claim links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works
Match quiz · 2 minutes · no sign-in
See which Windsor candidates match you
Also on your Windsor ballot
See something wrong? Report an error
Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.