Millersburg City Council · Nov 3, 2026
Mike
Hickam
Mike Hickam, the incumbent, is running for Millersburg City Council in the Nov 3, 2026 election; 4 candidates are running for 2 seats.
Not sure who to vote for? Answer a few questions and see which Millersburg candidates agree with you, and why.
No sign-in. Your answers stay on your device. We never endorse anyone. Report an error
The race · City Council
- 01Nicholas Alexander
- 02Scott CowanIncumbent
- 03Mike HickamYou’re reading
- 04Chuck Withrow
Background
- About
- Millersburg city councilor who works in financial management. His candidate filing lists a military background and service on the Millersburg Planning Commission.
- Party
- Nonpartisan race. City of Millersburg · May 26, 2026
On the record: Mike Hickam
9 sourced01Conser Road path2 sourced positions
Voted no on moving forward with the Conser Road pedestrian connection project (passed 3-2, August 2026).
Council voteMillersburg City Council minutes, August 11, 2026 · Aug 11, 2026LinkHow the council voted
as summarized in the City Council minutes; not a direct quote
Preferred waiting until the next budget cycle on the roughly $65,000 Conser Road path, saying a developer would likely be required to build it (August 2026).
Own statementMillersburg City Council minutes, August 11, 2026 · Aug 11, 2026Link
02Water rates1 sourced position
Voted yes on freezing water rates for one year (failed 2-2 with one abstention, January 2026).
Council voteMillersburg City Council minutes, January 13, 2026 · Jan 13, 2026LinkHow the council voted
03Sewer rates1 sourced position
Voted yes on dropping the planned 3 percent sewer rate increase (passed 4-1, January 2026).
Council voteMillersburg City Council minutes, January 13, 2026 · Jan 13, 2026LinkHow the council voted
04City engineer pay1 sourced position
Voted yes on a $116,000 to $152,000 salary range for the city engineer position (passed 4-1, September 2026).
Council voteMillersburg City Council minutes, September 8, 2026 · Sep 8, 2026LinkHow the council voted
05Utility assistance2 sourced positions
Voted yes on postponing the utility assistance program discussion to a September 30 work session (passed 4-1, September 2026).
Council voteMillersburg City Council minutes, September 8, 2026 · Sep 8, 2026LinkHow the council voted
as summarized in the City Council minutes; not a direct quote
Supported a utility assistance program but said he would not support funding it through higher utility rates for all ratepayers (August 2026).
Own statementMillersburg City Council minutes, August 11, 2026 · Aug 11, 2026Link
06ATI enterprise zone1 sourced position
Voted yes on Resolutions 2026-05 and 2026-06 for ATI enterprise zone benefits (passed 4-0, May 2026).
Council voteMillersburg City Council minutes, May 12, 2026 · May 12, 2026LinkHow the council voted
07How the mayor is chosen1 sourced position
as summarized in the City Council minutes; not a direct quote
Said he was on the fence about a directly elected mayor, citing the city's difficulty filling council seats; the council took no vote (July 2026).
still kind of on the fence”
Own statementMillersburg City Council minutes, July 14, 2026 · Jul 14, 2026Link
Every claim links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works
Mike Hickam: their words and their votes on the same issue
Conser Road path
In their words
Preferred waiting until the next budget cycle on the roughly $65,000 Conser Road path, saying a developer would likely be required to build it (August 2026).
Aug 11, 2026 ·as summarized in the City Council minutes; not a direct quote ·Millersburg City Council minutes, August 11, 2026 · Aug 11, 2026
On the record
Voted no on moving forward with the Conser Road pedestrian connection project (passed 3-2, August 2026).
Aug 11, 2026 ·Millersburg City Council minutes, August 11, 2026 · Aug 11, 2026
Match quiz · 2 minutes · no sign-in
See which Millersburg candidates match you
Also on your Millersburg ballot
See something wrong? Report an error
Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.