Pine City Council · Nov 3, 2026
Mollie
Davis
Mollie Davis is running for Pine City Council in the Nov 3, 2026 election; 3 candidates are running for 2 seats.
Not sure who to vote for? Answer a few questions and see which Pine City candidates agree with you, and why.
No sign-in. Your answers stay on your device. We never endorse anyone. Report an error
The race · City Council
- 01Mollie DavisYou’re reading
- 02David L. HillIncumbent
- 03Anthony Olson
Background
- About
- Independent consultant who operates NorthStar Defense Acquisitions LLC.
- Campaign website
- molliedavisforpinecitycouncil.com
On the record: Mollie Davis
5 sourced01Open government1 sourced position
Says public decisions need public explanations of the options, the costs and the reasoning.
Public decisions need public explanations.”
Own statementMollie Davis for Pine City CouncilLink
02City ordinances1 sourced position
Opposes city standards that she says turn personal preferences into restrictions on everyone else.
I oppose HOA-style municipal standards that turn personal preferences into restrictions on everyone else.”
Own statementMollie Davis for Pine City CouncilLink
03License-plate cameras1 sourced position
Says surveillance proposals such as license-plate-reader cameras need clear public explanations before approval.
That is exactly why surveillance proposals need clear, public explanations before approval”
Own statementMollie Davis for Pine City CouncilLink
04City spending1 sourced position
Says water, sewer, streets and public safety should be the city's spending focus.
Water, sewer, streets and public safety—period.”
Own statementMollie Davis for Pine City CouncilLink
05Past candidacies1 sourced position
Ran for Pine City City Council in 2024 as a nonpartisan candidate (lost).
Council voteMinnesota Secretary of State · Nov 5, 2024Link
Every claim links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works
Match quiz · 2 minutes · no sign-in
See which Pine City candidates match you
Also on your Pine City ballot
See something wrong? Report an error
Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.