Eaton Rapids City Council · Nov 3, 2026
Deb
Malewski
Councilmember, Precinct 1; term end not confirmedCity of Eaton Rapids
Deb Malewski (Councilmember, Precinct 1) is not on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot and will stay on the Eaton Rapids City Council after the election.
Not sure who to vote for? Answer a few questions and see which Eaton Rapids candidates agree with you, and why.
No sign-in. Your answers stay on your device. We never endorse anyone. Report an error
Background
- About
- Precinct 1 council member, elected in November 2023; former director of the Jean Bradford Kline Senior Center.
- Party
- Nonpartisan race. WKAR · Oct 3, 2026
On the record: Deb Malewski
4 sourced01Budget1 sourced position
Voted yes on Resolution 2026-49 adopting the city budget and setting millage rates (passed 5-0, June 2026).
Council voteEaton Rapids City Council meeting minutes, June 8, 2026 · Jun 8, 2026LinkHow the council voted
02Animal control1 sourced position
Voted yes on Resolution 2026-89 supporting exploring a partnership with Eaton County for animal control services (passed 5-0, September 2026).
Council voteEaton Rapids City Council meeting minutes, September 14, 2026 · Sep 14, 2026LinkHow the council voted
03Fire truck1 sourced position
Voted yes on Resolution 2026-20 requesting federal Congressional Directed Spending to replace the fire department's aerial fire truck (passed 5-0, March 2026).
Council voteEaton Rapids City Council meeting minutes, March 9, 2026 · Mar 9, 2026LinkHow the council voted
04Fair housing1 sourced position
Voted yes on Ordinance 2026-05, which rescinds Chapter 8¾ (Fair Housing) and adds Fair Housing sections to Chapter 10 (passed 4-1, August 2026).
Council voteEaton Rapids City Council meeting minutes, August 24, 2026 · Aug 24, 2026LinkHow the council voted
Every claim links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works
Match quiz · 2 minutes · no sign-in
See which Eaton Rapids candidates match you
Also on your Eaton Rapids ballot
See something wrong? Report an error
Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.