Beverly Hills · On the record

How the council voted

Every recorded council vote in this guide where two or more of the people we profile voted, side by side. Each line was checked against the meeting minutes it links to. Only candidates and members with a page in this guide are listed; open the minutes for the full roll call.

Animal ordinance

Apr 15, 2025

A 90-day moratorium tied to the keeping of farm animals and other animals ordinance

Result as recorded: passed 5-2, Apr. 2025

  • YesRyan O’GormanVoted yes on a 90-day moratorium tied to the keeping of farm animals and other animals ordinance (passed 5-2, Apr. 2025).
  • YesTim MercerVoted yes on a 90-day moratorium tied to the keeping of farm animals and other animals ordinance (passed 5-2, Apr. 2025).
  • NoRacheal HrydziuszkoVoted no on a 90-day moratorium tied to the keeping of farm animals and other animals ordinance (passed 5-2, Apr. 2025).
  • NoTracy KecskemetiVoted no on a 90-day moratorium tied to the keeping of farm animals and other animals ordinance (passed 5-2, Apr. 2025).

Beverly Hills Village Council minutes, Apr. 15, 2025 · Apr 15, 2025Link

Chicken ordinance

Oct 7, 2025

Adopting Ordinance No. 392A as modified, after amendments to the section on keeping of chickens

Result as recorded: passed 4-3, Oct. 2025

  • YesJohn GeorgeVoted yes on adopting Ordinance No. 392A as modified, after amendments to the section on keeping of chickens (passed 4-3, Oct. 2025).
  • YesRacheal HrydziuszkoVoted yes on adopting Ordinance No. 392A as modified, after amendments to the section on keeping of chickens (passed 4-3, Oct. 2025).
  • YesRyan O’GormanVoted yes on adopting Ordinance No. 392A as modified, after amendments to the section on keeping of chickens (passed 4-3, Oct. 2025).
  • YesTracy KecskemetiVoted yes on adopting Ordinance No. 392A as modified, after amendments to the section on keeping of chickens (passed 4-3, Oct. 2025).
  • NoRock AbboudVoted no on adopting Ordinance No. 392A as modified, after amendments to the section on keeping of chickens (passed 4-3, Oct. 2025).
  • NoTim MercerVoted no on adopting Ordinance No. 392A as modified, after amendments to the section on keeping of chickens (passed 4-3, Oct. 2025).

Beverly Hills Village Council minutes, Oct. 7, 2025 · Oct 7, 2025Link

Fence ordinance

Aug 19, 2025

Sending the fence ordinance back to the Planning Commission to address language on white fences

Result as recorded: passed 5-2, Aug. 2025

  • NoRacheal HrydziuszkoVoted no on sending the fence ordinance back to the Planning Commission to address language on white fences (passed 5-2, Aug. 2025).
  • NoTracy KecskemetiVoted no on sending the fence ordinance back to the Planning Commission to address language on white fences (passed 5-2, Aug. 2025).

Beverly Hills Village Council minutes, Aug. 19, 2025 · Aug 19, 2025Link

Prosecution services

Sidewalk loan

Apr 1, 2025

Authorizing a $2,000,000 State Infrastructure Bank loan at 3.25% for 10 years for the TAP/SRTS program

Result as recorded: passed 6-1, Apr. 2025

  • YesJohn GeorgeVoted yes on authorizing a $2,000,000 State Infrastructure Bank loan at 3.25% for 10 years for the TAP/SRTS program (passed 6-1, Apr. 2025).
  • YesRacheal HrydziuszkoVoted yes on authorizing a $2,000,000 State Infrastructure Bank loan at 3.25% for 10 years for the TAP/SRTS program (passed 6-1, Apr. 2025).
  • YesRock AbboudVoted yes on authorizing a $2,000,000 State Infrastructure Bank loan at 3.25% for 10 years for the TAP/SRTS program (passed 6-1, Apr. 2025).
  • YesRyan O’GormanVoted yes on authorizing a $2,000,000 State Infrastructure Bank loan at 3.25% for 10 years for the TAP/SRTS program (passed 6-1, Apr. 2025).
  • YesTracy KecskemetiVoted yes on authorizing a $2,000,000 State Infrastructure Bank loan at 3.25% for 10 years for the TAP/SRTS program (passed 6-1, Apr. 2025).
  • NoTim MercerVoted no on authorizing a $2,000,000 State Infrastructure Bank loan at 3.25% for 10 years for the TAP/SRTS program (passed 6-1, Apr. 2025).

Beverly Hills Village Council minutes, Apr. 1, 2025 (draft) · Apr 1, 2025Link

Sidewalk maintenance assessment

Apr 1, 2025

A resolution tentatively establishing a special assessment district for the sidewalk maintenance project

Result as recorded: passed 5-2, Apr. 2025

  • YesJohn GeorgeVoted yes on a resolution tentatively establishing a special assessment district for the sidewalk maintenance project (passed 5-2, Apr. 2025).
  • YesRock AbboudVoted yes on a resolution tentatively establishing a special assessment district for the sidewalk maintenance project (passed 5-2, Apr. 2025).
  • YesRyan O’GormanVoted yes on a resolution tentatively establishing a special assessment district for the sidewalk maintenance project (passed 5-2, Apr. 2025).
  • NoRacheal HrydziuszkoVoted no on a resolution tentatively establishing a special assessment district for the sidewalk maintenance project (passed 5-2, Apr. 2025).
  • NoTracy KecskemetiVoted no on a resolution tentatively establishing a special assessment district for the sidewalk maintenance project (passed 5-2, Apr. 2025).

Beverly Hills Village Council minutes, Apr. 1, 2025 (draft) · Apr 1, 2025Link

Wendbrook Park

Mar 18, 2025

Authorizing an escrow agent for $136,419.06 for the acquisition of 30815 Wendbrook Lane

Result as recorded: passed 5-1, Mar. 2025

  • YesJohn GeorgeVoted yes on authorizing an escrow agent for $136,419.06 for the acquisition of 30815 Wendbrook Lane (passed 5-1, Mar. 2025).
  • YesRacheal HrydziuszkoVoted yes on authorizing an escrow agent for $136,419.06 for the acquisition of 30815 Wendbrook Lane (passed 5-1, Mar. 2025).
  • YesRyan O’GormanVoted yes on authorizing an escrow agent for $136,419.06 for the acquisition of 30815 Wendbrook Lane (passed 5-1, Mar. 2025).
  • YesTracy KecskemetiVoted yes on authorizing an escrow agent for $136,419.06 for the acquisition of 30815 Wendbrook Lane (passed 5-1, Mar. 2025).
  • NoTim MercerVoted no on authorizing an escrow agent for $136,419.06 for the acquisition of 30815 Wendbrook Lane (passed 5-1, Mar. 2025).

Beverly Hills Village Council minutes, Mar. 18, 2025 · Mar 18, 2025Link

A “—” means the line records something other than a plain yes or no (a motion, an abstention, or two votes in one line); read the line itself. How this guide works