Glasgow City Council · Nov 3, 2026
Tommy
Burris
Tommy Burris, the incumbent, is running for Glasgow City Council in the Nov 3, 2026 election; 17 candidates are running for 9 seats.
Not sure who to vote for? Answer a few questions and see which Glasgow candidates agree with you, and why.
No sign-in. Your answers stay on your device. We never endorse anyone. Report an error
The race · City Council
- 01Riley Boggs
- 02Terry L. BunnellIncumbent
- 03Tommy BurrisYou’re reading
- 04Jamie Read Fancher
- 05Alexandria L. Hayes
- 06Beau Jones
- 07Marna KirkpatrickIncumbent
- 08Chasity LoweryIncumbent
- 09James “Happy” NealIncumbent
- 10Melinda J. Overstreet
- 11Jeff Proffitt
- 12Michael R. Rich
- 13Kristen Nicole Roberts
- 14Elizabeth Dale ShoemakerIncumbent
- 15Cathy Thomas
- 16Joe TriggIncumbent
- 17Randy WilkinsonIncumbent
Background
- About
- Bowling Green Public Works employee, KHSAA official and lawn-care owner; incumbent Glasgow councilman.
On the record: Tommy Burris
3 sourced01Property tax rate1 sourced position
Voted yes on the first reading of the ordinance setting the 2025 property tax rate at 0.165 per $100 (passed 6-3, September 2025).
Council voteGlasgow News 1 · Sep 15, 2025LinkHow the council voted
02Parks and recreation1 sourced position
Said the new aquatic center will be a great addition and that he is glad prices will be low enough for everyone.
The new aquatic center will be a great addition to Glasgow and I’m glad the prices are going to be low enough that everyone can enjoy it.”
Own statementGlasgow News 1 · Mar 12, 2026Link
03Citizen involvement1 sourced position
Said he would love to see more citizen involvement in local government.
First, I would love to see more citizen involvement in local government.”
Own statementGlasgow News 1 · Mar 12, 2026Link
Every claim links to its source and was checked against it before publishing. How this guide works
Match quiz · 2 minutes · no sign-in
See which Glasgow candidates match you
Also on your Glasgow ballot
See something wrong? Report an error
Something wrong or missing? Tell us what and where, with a link to a source if you have one. Reports feed the next verification run.